Russia's new regulated crypto market is beginning to take shape, and one of its most important participants may be a traditional bank.
Sberbank, Russia's largest lender, expects cryptocurrency trading on regulated Russian exchanges to reach as much as 4 trillion rubles, or approximately $46.43 billion, during the first year of the new framework.
By 2029, that figure could reach roughly 7.5 trillion rubles, or $87.06 billion, according to Sberbank Deputy Chairman Anatoly Popov in an interview with Russian state news agency TASS.
The forecast is only one part of the story.
Sberbank has also been preparing crypto trading, custody and wallet infrastructure, while exploring the use of digital assets as collateral.
Together, those plans offer an early view of how Russia's regulated cryptocurrency market could develop: not primarily through crypto-native platforms, but increasingly through established banks and financial institutions.
Sberbank estimates regulated cryptocurrency trading in Russia could reach 3.5–4 trillion rubles during its first year, with the upper figure equivalent to approximately $46.43 billion. By 2029, the bank sees potential annual trading volume of about 7.5 trillion rubles, or $87.06 billion.
The forecast follows Russia's move toward a regulated market for cryptocurrency trading while continuing to restrict the domestic use of crypto as payment.
Sberbank is preparing infrastructure spanning crypto access, custody and potentially crypto-backed lending.
However, forecasts should not be confused with realized demand. Retail restrictions, approved-asset lists, implementation timelines and the willingness of existing crypto users to move onto regulated domestic venues will determine how quickly the market develops.
The broader significance is that one of Russia's largest financial institutions now sees crypto as a service that could be integrated into mainstream banking rather than remaining entirely outside it.
Sberbank's projection comes from SberCIB Investment Research.
According to Popov, cryptocurrency trading volumes are expected to remain below 4 trillion rubles during the first year, while reaching approximately 7.5 trillion rubles by 2029.
| Period | Sberbank estimate |
|---|---|
| First year | 3.5–4.0 trillion RUB |
| 2029 | ~7.5 trillion RUB |
| Upper first-year USD equivalent cited by TASS | ~$46.43B |
| 2029 USD equivalent cited by TASS | ~$87.06B |
These are market forecasts, not committed trading volumes or government targets.
That distinction is particularly important for a market moving from relatively fragmented crypto activity into a more formal regulatory structure.
Sberbank's estimate assumes that regulated domestic exchanges will initially capture only part of Russia's broader cryptocurrency activity.
That is reasonable.
Users who already hold or trade digital assets do not automatically migrate to new regulated venues simply because legislation changes.
Migration depends on:
fees;
supported assets;
liquidity;
custody arrangements;
customer eligibility;
trading limits;
and the convenience of the new products.
Russia's new framework also creates different levels of access for qualified and non-qualified investors.
MEXC's earlier analysis of the Russian crypto law signed in August 2026 explains that non-qualified investors face tighter purchase limits, while qualified investors receive broader access.
Those restrictions could meaningfully influence how much existing activity moves into regulated channels.
Sberbank's strategy goes beyond forecasting trading volumes.
The bank has been preparing infrastructure that could bring crypto-related services into its existing financial ecosystem.
That direction includes:
crypto wallet functionality;
digital-asset custody;
regulated trading infrastructure;
and crypto-backed lending.
The significance is distribution.
Instead of asking a conventional bank customer to leave the banking environment and establish an entirely separate financial relationship, a bank-led model can potentially place digital-asset services alongside existing accounts, investments and credit products.
A crypto trading button is relatively visible.
Custody infrastructure is less visible but arguably more important.
Institutional adoption requires answers to questions such as:
Who controls the keys?
How are assets segregated?
How are transfers approved?
How are customer assets recorded?
What happens if access credentials are compromised?
How does the institution satisfy compliance and reporting requirements?
Russia's regulatory framework specifically brings digital depositories and other intermediaries into a more formal operating structure. MEXC's earlier Russia-regulation analysis describes how exchanges, brokers, asset managers, trade organizers, clearing houses and digital depositories fall within the new framework.
For banks, custody can therefore become the foundation on which trading and lending products are built.
Priya Sharma, MEXC senior crypto industry analyst, views the $46.43 billion estimate as useful for understanding the potential size of the opportunity, but argues that the more important development is the distribution model emerging behind it. If crypto becomes accessible through large banking apps, digital-asset adoption in Russia could shift from a specialist activity toward a conventional financial-service workflow. That does not guarantee greater demand, but it substantially changes how customers can reach the market.
Sharma also cautions against treating regulated trading volume as entirely new crypto demand. A meaningful share could simply represent migration from existing offshore, OTC or peer-to-peer activity into domestic regulated channels. From an industry perspective, the relevant metric will therefore be not only gross volume but also how much genuinely new participation, custody assets and institutional activity the regulated framework attracts.
She believes the next stage will be determined by product breadth rather than legal permission alone. A bank that offers only a limited set of assets to a narrow investor group may generate far less activity than headline forecasts imply. Conversely, if custody, trading and collateralized lending become integrated under one regulated account, the bank could establish a much deeper relationship with digital-asset holders than a standalone execution service would provide.
This question needs a careful answer.
Russia's regulatory framework does not mean that every Sberbank customer automatically gained unrestricted access to Bitcoin on September 1.
Legal permission, operational infrastructure and customer eligibility are separate layers.
Actual access depends on factors including:
Sberbank's product rollout;
regulatory approval;
investor classification;
supported cryptocurrencies;
and applicable purchase limits.
This distinction is important because announcements about infrastructure development are often mistaken for fully launched retail products.
Trading is only one potential revenue source.
A more structurally interesting product is lending against digital assets.
The model is familiar in crypto markets:
A borrower pledges cryptocurrency as collateral.
The lender provides fiat or another asset.
If the collateral value falls below agreed thresholds, additional collateral or liquidation may be required.
For a commercial bank, the concept creates an opportunity to serve customers who hold substantial digital assets without requiring those customers to sell them first.
Not all crypto collateral behaves the same way.
Bitcoin has substantial liquidity but significant price volatility.
Ether combines market volatility with a different network and economic structure.
Dollar stablecoins are designed to maintain a stable value but introduce issuer, reserve, redemption and regulatory risks instead of the same degree of market-price volatility.
Banks therefore cannot apply one collateral policy uniformly across all digital assets.
Haircuts, liquidity requirements, custody standards and liquidation rules may differ substantially.
This is also why stated ambitions to support additional assets should not be presented as already-approved products until regulatory and operational conditions are confirmed.
Imagine a client owns $5 million worth of BTC but needs $1 million in working capital.
Selling Bitcoin creates a taxable or investment decision and removes the client's exposure to the asset.
A collateralized loan offers a different structure:
retain the asset → pledge it → borrow against it.
Banks already understand collateralized lending.
The challenge is adapting existing risk systems to an asset class that trades continuously and can experience sharp price movements.
If those systems mature, crypto custody can become more valuable because a custodied asset can potentially support multiple services:
trading;
collateral;
settlement;
wealth management;
and structured products.
MEXC's earlier coverage of Russia's new crypto law described the reform as a transition from fragmented offshore and OTC activity toward a domestic framework that the state can register, supervise and tax.
Sberbank's strategy illustrates what that may look like in practice.
The emerging path can be summarized as:
Bank customer
↓
Regulated crypto access
↓
Institutional custody
↓
Trading
↓
Potential collateralized lending
That structure is very different from the early crypto model in which users typically transferred money out of banks before accessing digital assets.
No.
This is another area where headlines can become misleading.
Russia's new framework expands regulated cryptocurrency investment and trading, but it does not generally turn Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies into domestic payment money.
MEXC's detailed examination of the legislation notes that the prohibition on using crypto to pay for ordinary goods and services remains, while specific carve-outs exist for areas such as certain foreign-trade settlements.
So Russia is effectively separating:
crypto as an investment/financial asset
from
crypto as everyday domestic money.
Sberbank has a legitimate reason to study the size of a market in which it may become an important participant.
That does not make its forecast a certainty.
Several variables could produce a lower result:
retail purchase restrictions;
slow licensing;
limited supported assets;
lower crypto-market activity;
strong preference for existing channels;
or delayed product launches.
There is also an upside scenario in which regulated custody attracts users who previously avoided crypto because they were uncomfortable with specialist platforms or self-custody.
For SEO and market analysis, the forecast is therefore most useful as an indicator of institutional expectations, not as a prediction that should be presented as settled fact.
The broader trend is not unique to Russia.
Banks, payment networks and asset managers worldwide are experimenting with ways to place traditional financial services onto blockchain-compatible infrastructure.
The interesting question is increasingly not whether traditional finance will interact with digital assets.
It is which parts of the crypto stack banks will absorb themselves.
Custody is one candidate.
Stablecoin settlement is another.
Tokenized securities and deposits offer additional examples.
Sberbank's strategy extends that logic into trading and collateralized credit.
Four developments will determine whether the current plans become economically significant.
First is actual product availability. Announced infrastructure matters less than services customers can use.
Second is the approved asset list.
Third is the number and type of customers eligible for access.
Fourth is realized trading and custody volume.
If regulated platforms reach anything close to Sberbank's forecast, Russia would develop a sizeable domestic crypto-financial market.
If most users remain in existing channels, the legislation may initially change the regulatory structure more than the economic behavior underneath it.
Sberbank estimates regulated exchange trading could reach approximately 3.5–4 trillion rubles during the first year, with the upper estimate equivalent to around $46.43 billion.
Sberbank projects approximately 7.5 trillion rubles, or about $87.06 billion at the conversion cited by TASS.
Sberbank has been preparing infrastructure around regulated crypto access, custody and related financial services as Russia implements its new cryptocurrency framework.
No such assumption should be made. Availability depends on product rollout, supported assets, regulation and customer eligibility.
It is a loan in which cryptocurrency is pledged as collateral. The lender can require additional collateral or liquidate assets if their value falls below agreed thresholds.
No. Russia is establishing regulated crypto investment and trading infrastructure while maintaining restrictions on using cryptocurrency for ordinary domestic payments.
Sberbank could bring trading, custody and lending into an established banking environment, potentially changing how mainstream customers access digital assets.
No. It is a Sberbank market estimate. Actual volume will depend on regulation, supported products, market conditions and customer adoption.
This article is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment or legal advice. Market forecasts are inherently uncertain, and regulatory requirements, supported crypto assets and Sberbank's product plans may change.

For much of crypto’s history, blockchain was presented as technology that could make banks less important. U.S. banks are now exploring a different outcome: using blockchain themselves. On August 25,

A stock trade can happen in a fraction of a second. Settling that trade is another matter. Behind the simple “Buy” button sits a network of brokers, custodians, securities depositories, banks and

Updated: August 25, 2026, 09:30 (UTC+8) | Author: MEXC Headlines CME adds ENA reference rates for three trading sessions Germany’s number of authorized CASPs reaches 79 South Korea plans to introduce

Overview On the morning of August 27, the Bank of Korea raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to 3.00%, the first back-to-back hike since January 2023. Conventional logic says a tightening

Overview Bitcoin registered an unprecedented historical milestone over the past week, advancing from the $64,000 zone to touch highs near $79,000. According to quantitative market tracking from The

The Federal Reserve’s latest meeting minutes have provided investors with a clearer look at the debate taking place inside the U.S. central bank. Released on August 19, the minutes from the July

Institutional participation is becoming the dominant growth driver in crypto markets. From stablecoin payment networks and tokenized securities to blockchain-powered public services and AI-related fin

The convergence of AI, stablecoins, and tokenized finance continues to accelerate. Ripple launched AI-powered payment infrastructure on XRPL, Mastercard introduced an autonomous payment protocol for A

Two versions of money are competing to move onto blockchains.One came from crypto.The other is coming from banks.Stablecoins such as USDT and USDC have already demonstrated that dollar-denominated val

Crypto projects have spent a record amount buying their own tokens in 2026. According to data from blockchain analytics firm Allium Labs reported by the Financial Times, crypto groups spent approximat

A quiet competition is taking place over one of the fastest-growing corners of tokenized finance.BlackRock's BUIDL has regained its position as the largest tokenized U.S. Treasury product, edging back