Key Insights: Crypto ETFs faced renewed pressure on July 1 after U.S. spot Bitcoin funds posted heavy withdrawals. SoSoValue data showed investors pulled capitalKey Insights: Crypto ETFs faced renewed pressure on July 1 after U.S. spot Bitcoin funds posted heavy withdrawals. SoSoValue data showed investors pulled capital

Crypto ETFs Face Bitcoin ETF Shock as Whales Defend Market Floor

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
crypto etfs bitcoin etf

Key Insights:

  • Crypto ETFs recorded broad outflows, with Bitcoin funds leading withdrawals.
  • Ethereum funds absorbed inflows, while demand for Bitcoin ETFs weakened.
  • Whale cost bases kept the near-term market structure divided.

Crypto ETFs faced renewed pressure on July 1 after U.S. spot Bitcoin funds posted heavy withdrawals. SoSoValue data showed investors pulled capital from major crypto-linked products. Bitcoin also hovered near a disputed support zone.

The move mattered because exchange-traded fund flows had shaped institutional demand since the launch of spot products. A weak Bitcoin ETF tape suggested large allocators cut exposure, even as on-chain buyers rebuilt positions.

Crypto ETFs Outflows Hit Bitcoin ETF Demand

SoSoValue data showed U.S. spot Bitcoin products recorded $295 million in net outflows. Grayscale Bitcoin Mini Trust drew $36.331 million, making it the largest single-day inflow among Bitcoin funds.

Crypto Patel’s ETF flow tracker showed total U.S. spot crypto ETFs lost about $277.3 million across listed products. The same dataset showed Bitcoin funds sold 4,896 BTC, while XRP funds lost $1.86 million.

The split showed that selling pressure remained concentrated in Bitcoin exposure. Ethereum products moved in the opposite direction, even as risk appetite stayed weak.

The Ethereum group recorded $14.895 million in net inflows during the same session. BlackRock’s ETHA led that category after it added $36.639 million.

That divergence pointed to selective capital rotation rather than a full exit from crypto products. It also reduced the impact of smaller inflows into selected altcoin funds.

BlackRock’s Bitcoin vehicle carried the heaviest pressure in Crypto Patel’s fund-level breakdown. The tracker showed the issuer sold 3,650 BTC while buying 21,610 ETH through its Ether product.

Fidelity reduced Bitcoin exposure, while Grayscale trimmed holdings across its larger spot vehicle. Smaller issuers, however, absorbed limited Bitcoin demand during the same flow window.

Crypto ETFs Split as Whale Buying Returns

Ali Charts said wallet behavior shifted after a long selling phase. His reading showed that retail wallets below 1 BTC increased their accumulation intensity.

Source: XSource: X

Mid-sized wallets between 10 and 100 BTC also increased buying pressure. Larger entities stopped net selling, though they scaled entries more slowly.

The contrast between outflows of crypto ETFs and wallet accumulation framed the current Bitcoin debate. If direct buyers absorbed institutional selling, spot supply could tighten near support.

However, whale cost-basis data showed that recent large buyers still faced losses. Amr Taha wrote that new whales had a realized price of $69,900 on June 30.

Bitcoin traded near $60,100 at that time, leaving that cohort roughly 14% underwater. That gap created a potential sell zone if rallies returned toward their average entry price.

Taha also cited Binance user deposit addresses as the broader market line. Their realized price stood at $57,070, which kept the wider structure intact while Bitcoin held above it.

Older whale cohorts showed less stress. Miner whales carried a realized price of $53,373, while long-term holder whales sat at $47,688. Those levels suggested pressure had not spread across all large holders. The stress stayed focused on newer buyers who entered near the cycle peak.

Crypto ETFs Pressure Leaves Bitcoin Dominance Flat

Daan Crypto Trades said Bitcoin dominance stayed almost unchanged this year. He added that the metric traded slightly below its yearly open.

Source: Daan Crypto/XSource: Daan Crypto/X

That reading showed neither Bitcoin nor major altcoins built clear leadership. Mid-cap tokens moved at times, but large-cap assets stayed weak against Bitcoin.

Jelle said the market continued to fight around the psychological support area. Bulls repeatedly dragged the price back after sellers pushed it below the range.

The comment matched the ETF data because fund withdrawals failed to trigger a clean breakdown. Still, the absence of strong dominance trends limited any broad altcoin rotation.

Source: Whale Factor/XSource: Whale Factor/X

Whale Factor framed the ETF withdrawal trend as a stress test for the institutional narrative. The account said about 100,000 BTC had left exchange-traded products during the selloff.

Reuters reported that Citi cut its Bitcoin and Ether forecasts after negative exchange-traded fund flows. The bank also cited weaker investor demand and slower U.S. digital asset legislation.

Bitcoin now faces a narrow test between ETF selling and on-chain demand. A hold above the Binance realized-price level would preserve the constructive structure. A break below it would shift attention toward miner whale cost bases and deeper liquidity.

The post Crypto ETFs Face Bitcoin ETF Shock as Whales Defend Market Floor appeared first on The Coin Republic.

Market Opportunity
United Stables Logo
United Stables Price(U)
$1.0007
$1.0007$1.0007
0.00%
USD
United Stables (U) Live Price Chart

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

World Cup Combo: Aim for 200xWorld Cup Combo: Aim for 200x

Combine up to 20 World Cup matches in one order

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.